bds Bdinski (Petka R)

chapter view

sentence 102

í+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction

ne+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle

vidîmaa lemma: vidja 'see'
form: ptcp.prs.pass
alt.analysis: f.sg.nom.pron

by̏stь^. lemma: bъda 'become'
form: 2/3sg.aor


and it became invisible.

total elements: 4


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT i ne vidimaa bystъ 
cc(i-2, bystъ-5)
advmod(ne-3, vidimaa-4)
obl:pred(vidimaa-4, bystъ-5)
root(bystъ-5, ROOT)


í+
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→4


ne+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 2
dependency: advmod→3


vidîmaa
vidimaa
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmpp-s or Afsny
form: ptcp.prs.pass or f.sg.nom.pron
element 3
dependency: obl:pred→4


by̏stь^.
bystъ
lemma: bъda 'become' SJS Miklosich LOVe search
Also used for conditional particles bix, bi, etc. Non-present forms using the root by- (aorist, imperative, conditional) are handled as anaspectual in our OCS sources.
inflection: e-verb
suffixes: nasal present -on-
tag: Vmia3s
form: 2/3sg.aor
element 4
dependency: root→0